In addition to todays news, we also got a fresh look at Doc Ock fighting Spider-Man, which caused Doc Ock to trend on Twitter. The results of that decision, unfortunately, speak for themselves. It remains to be seen if theyll be a part of No Way Home also. Neither actor says anything when they appear, which forces the film to cut from their repurposed transformations to shots of Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire saying lines to actors who very obviously aren’t on the other side of the camera.Ĭould Marvel and Sony really not get Ifans and Haden Church back in costume to read new lines? Not even for a day? Given how many actors from Sony’s past Spider-Man films they convinced to come back for No Way Home, it seems more likely that the two studios simply thought they didn’t need to put in the same amount of effort for Haden Church and Ifans as they did for Willem Dafoe and Alfred Molina. Not only are the shots clearly from those films, but they’re also awkwardly shoved into No Way Home’s climax. Illogical narrative choices and bad CGI aside, the creative decision to just reuse shots from Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man for Sandman and the Lizard’s transformations at the end of No Way Home is inexcusable. Having him maintain his sand form for all of Spider-Man: No Way Home is therefore a weird choice, especially since the CGI necessary to bring him to life never looks good. Unlike Ifans’ Curt Connors, Church’s Flint Marko can go back and forth between his human and sand forms whenever he wants. The Short End of the Stick - The Lizard being a CGI character in Spider-Man: No Way Home makes sense, but the same can’t be said for Sandman. The Lizard (Rhys Ifans) in 2012’s The Amazing Spider-Man.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |